Why Most Rebrands Fail

And How to Break Free

share

share

date

18.03.2025

WORK

by David Carlo

Perspectives by David Carlo Art Director Aesthetics - Why most rebrands fail

There's a moment in every brand meeting when someone pulls up the competition. "We like what they're doing." And right there, the problem begins.

I've sat in those rooms. The mood boards look identical. The same fonts. The same "clean aesthetic." The same safe choices disguised as strategy. And then everyone wonders why their brand doesn't stand out.

Here's what I've learned: aesthetic direction isn't about following what works. It's about finding what's true. True to the product. True to the founder's vision. True to the story no one else can tell.

The brands that stay in your mind, didn't get there by benchmarking. They got there by having the courage to look like themselves.

Traditional branding approaches focus on the fundamentals: logos, color palettes, and basic visual systems. While these elements remain important, true brand sustainability emerges from something more profound, the courage to make one strong choice and commit to it completely.

The logos are usually fine, the color palettes considered, the guidelines thorough. The design often isn't the problem.

The problem is that no one inside the company actually believes in it.

No one believes in it

Here's how it typically goes: leadership decides it's time to "refresh the brand". They hire an agency. The agency runs workshops, presents mood boards, delivers a beautiful new identity. There's a launch event. Everyone updates their email signatures. For about three weeks, there's genuine excitement.

Then reality sets in.

The sales team keeps using old templates because the new ones "don't work for their clients". Marketing adjusts the logo colors because "this blue performs better digitally". Someone creates a presentation that ignores every guideline. Within six months, the brand has drifted. Within two years, you can barely tell there was a rebrand at all.

Protecting the brand

This happens because most rebrands treat visual identity as a deliverable. As something that gets designed and handed over, like a piece of software. But a brand isn't a deliverable. It's a living system that requires constant reinforcement, interpretation, and defense.

The effect of conviction

The rebrands that stick have one thing in common: someone inside the organization who truly owns it. Not just approves it but owns it. Someone who understands not just what the brand looks like, but why it looks that way. Someone who can make a hundred small decisions a week and keep them all aligned.

Without that, a rebrand is just a very expensive PDF. 

When I work with clients, I spend as much time building conviction as building guidelines. I want them to feel the logic, not just see the output. Because when the inevitable moment comes, when someone suggests "just this once, let's bend the rules", they need to understand why the answer is no.

Design is the easy part. Belief is where rebrands succeed or fail.